klaineharmony:

teiledesganzen:

lookninjas:

soundingonlyatnightasyousleep:

tiktokofoz:

soundingonlyatnightasyousleep:

klaineharmony:

teiledesganzen:

misqueue:

I’m still sometimes a little uncertain about how to understand the concept of privilege in some situations, so please tell me if I am mistaken here.

My current understanding is this:…

This is all very awesome, and it seems to me that most people don’t know that Blaine isn’t white. Rachel, remember, has a black dad, and is part of the Black Students Union.

I wanted to go back to one of the earlier comments in the reblog chain and pull out something vis a vis Darren’s ethnicity vs Blaine’s ethnicity:

Also, the idea that Blaine is mixed race because Darren is mixed race is just wrongheaded, and I’ve seen it again and again in posts. Actors play characters, and a considerable percentage of the time the racial/ethnic backgrounds of those characters do not correspond to the person themselves. (It’s really true when you have actors playing a completely different race, like Rita Moreno playing Tuptim in The King & I, or Marlene Dietrich playing Tanya - a Hispanic woman - in Touch of Evil.)

There’s a couple of problems with this argument.  For one, it’s becoming increasingly rare for actors to play outside their race, and there’s more of an outcry when it happens — look at the response to M. Night Shyalaman’s Avatar, or the Wachowski’s Cloud Atlas.  Or the eyebrows raised by Johnny Depp (who at least has a little Native heritage) playing Tonto.  Casting across racial lines is rapidly becoming a relic of times past, and that’s probably for the best, since so much cross-racial casting involved giving roles to white actors at the expense of actors of other ethnicities, who were barely represented in Hollywood in the fifties, and still aren’t very well-represented now.  Non-white actors deserve to have good roles, and people of all races deserve films that reflect the spectrum of human diversity, and not some weird, all-white parallel dimension.

And non-white actors deserve to have roles that reflect their ethnicity, rather than being whitewashed to fit.  And people of all races deserve the chance to see those characters, rather than being told to just assume everyone is white.

And I, personally, would like to hope that the writers of Glee are keeping that in mind at least a little bit when they write Blaine, rather than just sort of assuming that since he hasn’t been specifically written to fill one of the “ethnic” slots, he’s gotta be a white guy.

(And to get back to the subject of passing privilege again — look, I obviously don’t know Darren Criss in real life.  I don’t know his feelings on this, and I won’t pretend to.  But I can’t help but feel that it might just be a little weird for a guy who once did a music video wearing a t-shirt that said Hapa on it to continually be read as white, to the point where it’s considered strange that he might play a character that reflects his actual, real-life background.)

I also believe that the Glee writers are completely aware of the fact that Darren Criss has positioned himself in terms of race/ethnicity quite explicitly (e.g. that Hapa t-shirt). And if we consider how often Glee cast members have talked about Glee stories being inspired by what happened in their lives, how often the actors blur the line between their roles and themselves (or rather, their public personas), and how much Glee plays with this blur (see my recent comments about Jane Lynch playing Sue in the bathroom scene with Unique and Marley) I’d be surprised if Blaine’s race/ethnicity wasn’t alluded to by the things we mentioned earlier very much on purpose.

And speaking of Darren Criss and race: is it selective perception on my part (due to being white and watching DC more closely than, say, Dianna Agron or Cory Monteith) or does he end up in pictures with people of color a lot more often than other Glee cast members? At any rate, I’ve noticed this, and I wouldn’t be surprised if DC didn’t create these associations on purpose (which is nevertheless pure speculation on my part).

Lookninjas: You’re completely right about the need for non-white actors to have good roles, the horrible lack of representation of actors of other ethnicities in a younger and less inclusive Hollywood, and that we all need films that reflect the wonderful diversity of human beings. I don’t disagree at all. What I was trying to get at was the problem I see in what you said here: “it’s becoming increasingly rare for actors to play outside their race, and there’s more of an outcry when it happens.” Isn’t that problematic as well? If actors are limited only to roles that fit their race/ethnicity, doesn’t that also limit them as actors and as people? Actors are in the business of trying to portray the human experience; they try to walk in the shoes of other people for a living. If people were upset when Johnny Depp played Tonto, when he does in fact have some Native American blood, what on earth would they say if Naya Rivera wanted to play a Native American or Spanish character? She could; I’m sure she would be wonderful at it. She might not get cast, though, because she’s Puerto Rican, African American, and German. To go back to my earlier thought, what happens if Darren wants to play someone who is German or Scottish, and people say, “Oh, well, we can’t cast him for that; he’s Filipino”? If we start assuming that every character is the same race or ethnicity as the person portraying them, it’s another kind of limitation, both for them and for us. Many people, like Johnny and Naya, come from multiple ethnicities. Darren is Irish as well as Filipino. I myself have about six different ethnicities in my family bloodline, though I look primarily English and Irish. Categorizing people as one race or ethnicity (and categorizing characters according to the races and ethnicities of the actors) seems as though it could be just as problematic and reductive as Hollywood whitewashing.

All of this is not meant to diminish the fact that Darren has done wonderful things through openly acknowledging his Filipino background and being proud of who he is, as he should be. He has done amazing things, and we all love him for it. The same can be said of many, many other actors who have broken new ground in the profession by deliberately advocating for and celebrating diversity. They should be proud; they should advocate for diversity; they should want to see it celebrated and portrayed onscreen. All of this increases awareness about the world and the beautiful reality of living in a multiracial and multiethnic society. Representation is essential; allowing people to see and identify with characters who are like them is essential. I just worry that Hollywood (and by extension, fandom) is trading one kind of stereotyping for another.

Leaving aside the question of a non-Native actor playing a Native role for a second (I live in an area with a heavy tribal presence; I have a lot of feelings on that one):

I guess my answer to any questions about Darren or Naya or whoever playing a Spanish or a Scottish or a German role is — who says that you have to be white just because you’re Spanish or Scottish or German?  Unless the role is that of a historical figure who was known to have been white AND Spanish, or white AND Scottish, or white AND German, what the fuck does it matter, you know?  There is this sort of pervasive belief, particularly in the United States, that all characters default to white unless there’s some kind of huge deal made about the fact that they’re not  I think that’s shit.  Like the nerds who blew up over Donald Glover as Spiderman — what the hell is specifically white about Spiderman?  He is specifically from New York.  He is specifically a nerd.  He is specifically a guy who lives with his aunt and uncle.  There’s no reason for him to be white.  There really isn’t.

But straight-up cross-casting as historically practiced by Hollywood is not about giving roles like Spiderman to actors like Donald Glover (who would have been perfect, but I digress).  It’s casting Mickey Rooney in yellowface in Breakfast at Tiffany’s, and Leslie Caron as a black woman in The Subterraneans.  It’s M. Night Shyamalan deciding that Avatar: the Last Airbender should have a mostly-white cast even though inspiration for the characters was drawn from East Asian and Inuit traditions.  Cross-casting, in movies, tends to go one way and one way only — taking roles that could go to Asian or Latino or even Black actors, and giving them to white people.  So it wouldn’t benefit Naya to bring it back, and it probably wouldn’t be that great for Darren either, in the long run.

(And in terms of giving Native roles to people of other ethnicities who “look” Native…  There has been a long, shining tradition in Hollywood of hiring Native people to stand and warwhoop in the background while non-Natives get the speaking roles, and it really has not changed that much since the early 1900s.  So with all due respect to Naya and other actresses like her, I personally am of the belief that Native roles should go to Native fucking people.  What few Native roles there are, anyway.)

soundingonlyatnightasyousleep:

tiktokofoz:

soundingonlyatnightasyousleep:

klaineharmony:

teiledesganzen:

misqueue:

I’m still sometimes a little uncertain about how to understand the concept of privilege in some situations, so please tell me if I am mistaken here.

My current understanding is this:…

This is all very awesome, and it seems to me that most people don’t know that Blaine isn’t white. Rachel, remember, has a black dad, and is part of the Black Students Union.

I wanted to go back to one of the earlier comments in the reblog chain and pull out something vis a vis Darren’s ethnicity vs Blaine’s ethnicity:

Also, the idea that Blaine is mixed race because Darren is mixed race is just wrongheaded, and I’ve seen it again and again in posts. Actors play characters, and a considerable percentage of the time the racial/ethnic backgrounds of those characters do not correspond to the person themselves. (It’s really true when you have actors playing a completely different race, like Rita Moreno playing Tuptim in The King & I, or Marlene Dietrich playing Tanya - a Hispanic woman - in Touch of Evil.)

There’s a couple of problems with this argument.  For one, it’s becoming increasingly rare for actors to play outside their race, and there’s more of an outcry when it happens — look at the response to M. Night Shyalaman’s Avatar, or the Wachowski’s Cloud Atlas.  Or the eyebrows raised by Johnny Depp (who at least has a little Native heritage) playing Tonto.  Casting across racial lines is rapidly becoming a relic of times past, and that’s probably for the best, since so much cross-racial casting involved giving roles to white actors at the expense of actors of other ethnicities, who were barely represented in Hollywood in the fifties, and still aren’t very well-represented now.  Non-white actors deserve to have good roles, and people of all races deserve films that reflect the spectrum of human diversity, and not some weird, all-white parallel dimension.

And non-white actors deserve to have roles that reflect their ethnicity, rather than being whitewashed to fit.  And people of all races deserve the chance to see those characters, rather than being told to just assume everyone is white.

And I, personally, would like to hope that the writers of Glee are keeping that in mind at least a little bit when they write Blaine, rather than just sort of assuming that since he hasn’t been specifically written to fill one of the “ethnic” slots, he’s gotta be a white guy.

(And to get back to the subject of passing privilege again — look, I obviously don’t know Darren Criss in real life.  I don’t know his feelings on this, and I won’t pretend to.  But I can’t help but feel that it might just be a little weird for a guy who once did a music video wearing a t-shirt that said Hapa on it to continually be read as white, to the point where it’s considered strange that he might play a character that reflects his actual, real-life background.)

mockanddee:

molly-aster:

lettersfromtitan:

Kurt is a terrible dancer in an entirely different way than Rachel.

If Kurt had gotten into NYADA he’d be in Cassandra July’s class. Let’s discuss how that would’ve gone. And how he would have responded.

Ughhh, this is in the…

TBH, I tend to be really pessimistic about what Kurt’s NYADA experience would’ve been.  Not so much because of his appearance or his mannerisms (he’s really not that feminine-looking, and acting classes should teach him how to alter his physicality to inhabit a character, so that’s not a big deal).  But Broadway tends to trade in really specific voices and vocal ranges, and Kurt’s just never going to fit into that standard Baritenor mold.  Even though he can hit the notes (Colfer’s got a pretty wide range), the timbre of his voice is unconventional, and I think most casting directors would say it’s not what they’re looking for.

I think Burt was right when he said Kurt was going to have to write his own parts.  I’m not sure that’s something that’ll literally happen on the show (although having him decide that he’s going to work for VogueDotCom and then apparently just walk right in and do exactly that is kind of a hilarious way of alluding to that line), but that really is what would have to happen for him to have a career in the theatre in real life.  Either writers would have to be so taken by him that they’d rework their whole concept on the spot just to give him a role (oh.  Hi, Ryan Murphy), or he’d have to actually sit down and write parts for himself (oh.  Hi, Struck By Lightning.)  He can’t just step into a pre-existing role the way that Rachel can. She’s a type.  He’s unique.

lookninjas:

I feel like I should have some words to explain how I think the first scene with Marley and her mom in “The New Rachel” was less about Marley and more about how hard it’s going to be for New Directions to fight a bullying culture that’s so ingrained that even adults wind up…

About Marley being the New Beiste (and this is going to be off-the-cuff and half-finished, so bear with me):

I need to rewatch the episode so I can get exact wording, but one of the things Marley says towards the end of the episode falls along the lines of “I thought you were better than this.”  Which I thought was very reminiscent of Beiste telling Will in her first episode that people said he was different than Sue (again, not exact wording, but you get what I mean).  And that really is the point of a lot of Marley’s scenes in this episode, just as it was the point of Beiste’s scenes in her first episode — to remind both the characters and the viewers that bullying affects real people, who are really hurt, and to point out which characters are willing to continue to hurt people in order to get what they want (Sue, Kitty), and which ones aren’t (Will and his Kids, the New Directions).  They’re there to force the decision and delineate the two sides — this group believes the ends justify the means, this group doesn’t.  It’s more about how they function in terms of the plot rather than in terms of their own characterization (which Marley doesn’t seem to have a lot of yet, but we’re only one episode in, so we’ll see).

On a side note — it’s really interesting to me, in retrospect, that Will jumps in to bullying Shannon with such glee, while “Will’s Kids” are so obviously uncomfortable picking on Marley’s mom.  Obviously, he recognizes that Shannon is a direct competitor for something he wants (budget money), and the kids don’t seem to be treating Marley as a real threat yet (they actively compete with each other for the spot of “The New Rachel,” but say nothing about the likelihood of Marley coming in and snatching the title, although Will couldn’t be more transparent in his intentions if he were made of glass), but it’s just…  I mean, those kids could not have looked more uncomfortable with the idea of insulting Marley’s mom behind her back, and yet Will was cackling as he and Sue humiliated Beiste in front of her team.  It’s an enormous difference.

I feel like I should have some words to explain how I think the first scene with Marley and her mom in “The New Rachel” was less about Marley and more about how hard it’s going to be for New Directions to fight a bullying culture that’s so ingrained that even adults wind up caving to it in the end.  And also to articulate this sort of half-formed idea I have that, although I know Will’s going to try to mold Marley into the new Rachel, she’s really more the New Beiste than anything else.  But I keep trying and I keep fucking up, so.  I guess that’ll have to wait for now.

(And yeah, I am putting my half baked ideas out there in the hopes that one of you will be smarter and/or more articulate than me and help me finish them up pretty.  If you think I have shame about this, you are sadly mistaken.)

(Well, you’re not, really, but I never let shame stop me.)

Tags: glee marley meta

Harder Than You Think (Is A Beautiful Thing)

So before we get started, I want to make one thing absolutely freaking clear:  This is my interpretation of Blaine’s character and how he is presented in canon.  This is not the only interpretation, nor is it necessarily the correct interpretation. You are not wrong if you interpret things differently than I do, and if anyone says so, they’re a jerk and should be ignored.  I am not the Almighty Judge of IC vs. OOC; please do not attempt to use me as such.  This is simply me breaking down why I see Blaine the way I do and what evidence I have to support it.  But it’s not an absolute statement of “This is how it must always be.”  Read what you like, write what you’re gonna.

(Incidentally, since I know that some of you are teachers:  May you all have the kind of influence on your students that Mrs. Stedman had on me.  I’m thirty-two, almost thirty-three now, and I still can’t make even the smallest argument without wanting to back it up with textual evidence.  Y’all are just lucky I’m too lazy to look up appropriate methods for citing tv episodes in MLA format, or there would be a works cited appended to everything I do.)

Anyway:  This is a post about why I believe Blaine is going to struggle with depression at some point in his life, and why I will gladly arm-wrestle anyone who believes that makes Blaine weak.  (And you’d be surprised — I’m very good at arm-wrestling, for all I’m made of scrawny.)

Read More

To clarify a little:  Blaine is Michael; Sebastian is Billie Jean.  (This is why Sebastian can’t get punished — “For forty days and for forty nights, the law was on her side.”  They actually follow the song pretty faithfully, except that Blaine never goes to Sebastian’s room.)

God I Hope Glee Costuming Doesn’t Change This Year

So I was watching “Michael” again, for reasons of my own, and realized a few things about “Wanna Be Starting Something”:

Artie and Mike are in the same red jacket (“Team Scream,” anyone?)

Brittany and Kurt are both wearing black leather (Kurt’s is one-piece, Brittany’s is pants and a jacket).

Rachel and Tina are both “Smooth Criminal,” but Tina’s got the white hat and is wearing a full suit; Rachel has the black hat and is wearing a dress (because Rachel doesn’t wear pants).

Rory and Sam are similar — black and gold, military/marching band chic. 

At first, I thought Santana was complementing Rory and Sam, but she’s actually combined a few looks — she’s military like they are, but she has a red version of Tina and Rachel’s “Smooth Criminal” hat, and the fact that her costume is so red-heavy ties her in with Artie and Mike (“an eye for an eye.”)  She doesn’t match Kurt or Brittany in any way that I can see, and she’s not matching Blaine, either.

While several of the characters have simply altered their outfits instead of completely changing (Kurt bedazzled his leather onesie but is still wearing it; Rachel took off her jacket and added the hat and socks; both Mike and Sam look as though they just threw a jacket on over what they were already wearing), Mercedes, Quinn, and Finn seem to have altered their look the least.  Mercedes has a silver glove; Finn has his usual Titans jersey with some sequins added, and Quinn put shoulder board epaulettes on her jacket (which don’t really go with the check, but anyway).

Blaine really likes “Billie Jean.” 

(Okay, okay, more Blaine detail — Blaine is wearing black sequins, as some of the others are, and there’s a small amount of red in his ensemble; he’s also one of several New Directions members to rock the sagging socks, and he’s got a silver glove like Mercedes.  But unlike Santana, who’s combined several looks and created her own thing, the overall effect of Blaine’s ensemble doesn’t look like the other people on that stage.  We’ve got Military Michael, we’ve got Thriller Michael, we’ve got Bad Michael, we’ve got Smooth Criminal Michael.  Blaine is the only Billie Jean, and I do think that says something about his position in the story, as well as Sebastian’s.)

ETA: Because I’m a dumbass — Quinn, Finn, and Mercedes all have numbers that reflect their ongoing plotlines, rather than the Blaine/Warblers storyline that’s the A plot of the story.  Hence their lack of costuming.

(Rachel is more involved with the A plot than Finn, being there for the confrontation in the Lima Bean, as well as the deleted showdown at Dalton.  Sam, like Rory, is more background in this episode than anything else, which is why he matches Rory and isn’t just in his street clothes and one random sequin.)

I Just Need to Get This Off My Chest

We don’t usually see Blaine full-on ugly-face crying on the show, this is true (although he damn well looks like he’s crying during the shower scene in “Fighter,” those scrunched-up eyes are hard to interpret as anything else).  But we do get the shiny-eyed, crack-in-the-voice, thirty-seconds-from-tears thing from him in “The First Time” (“I hope so.  I want you to be.”) and “Whitney” (the entire “This is cheating, Kurt” conversation and then again in the counseling session with Miss P).  His voice also cracks briefly during the Box Scene (the line about cookies.)  And he is a complete puffy-eyed wreck before and after “Somewhere Only We Know.”  So while it’s true that he doesn’t burst into tears and run away every single time Kurt comes into contact with anyone else (including his own father), it’s not like every single fic writer who shows him crying is writing him totally OOC.  Blaine does get emotional when he’s a) really in love and b) really scared of losing someone he loves.  It’s not totally out of the blue to show him crying.

(Woobie-fic, of course, is a completely different matter.  But I’d argue that characterization is really of secondary importance in that particular fic genre; as long as the hurt really hurts and the comfort is really comforting, everything else kind of goes by the wayside.  It’d be nice to see it more consistently labelled, though.)

You Taught Me More About Being a Man Than Anyone I’ve Ever Known

…  and that’s a problem, Will, it’s a problem.

So I finished my post about friendships off with a one-liner about how Will has been Finn’s most consistent friend.  With a minimum of prodding, I’d like to expand on that a little.  Putting it under a read-more not because I expect it to be very long, but because Will has no boundaries and I get that some people won’t want to read that.

(For the record, there will be no Will/Finn shipping here because creepybadwrong.)

Read More